BIOMIN, INC.

                                                                                                                State of the art water filtration media

 

We will lower operations costs by 50%, and bring them into compliance with discharge regulations.

                                                                                      

                                                                                                              P. O. Box 20028 . Ferndale, MI 48220

                                                                                                              (248) 544-2552. Fax: (248) 544-3733

                                                                                                              E-Mail: biomin@aol.com

                                                                                                              Web: www.biomininc.com

Technical Advisory #12

 

 

BIOMIN’S “TIP OF THE MONTH”:  REMEDIATION PRINCIPLES

 

The design of groundwater remediation programs and the selection/sequencing of effective remediation technologies are based on Richard Sloan’s remediation principles*.  They are:

 

1.     Physical and chemical properties of the contaminants.

2.     Concentrations of the contaminants in the groundwater and vadose soil zones.

3    Status of the source of the contaminants.

4.   Extent of any LNAPL or DNAPL present.

5.     Physical characteristics and lithology of the contaminated zone.

6.     Availability of utilities and support facilities.

7.     Status of at-risk receptors.

8.     Local and regional socio-political interest.

 

“Pump and Treat” is effective in remediating groundwater under the appropriate conditions.  When the contaminants have a relatively high water solubility and low liquid/solid absorption co-efficient, then “Pump and Treat” is an efficient, cost effective component of the overall remediation program. At sites, which include spilled/leaked fuel and/or chlorinated solvents, the remedial design, the technology selection/sequencing, and the remedial progress/cost are driven by the gasoline component. Bioremediation, both ex situ and in situ, is usually an integral part of such a design.

 

Typically, “Pump and Treat”, combined with soil vapor extraction and in situ thermal desorption is used when the total VOC concentration exceeds 5-10 ppm. When the VOC concentration drops below 5 ppm, then in situ bioremediation, using “Pump and Treat” can be cost effective if the main objective is the removal of biological waste and its by-products, or to supply oxygen or nutrients.

 

 The “Pump and Treat” method is used as either primary or support technology.  As remediation progresses “Pump and Treat” often alternates between primary and support status.  For example, you would be following this principle if you carried out the following sequence:

·        Begin remediation of a site contaminated with creosote by surfactant flushing (see Technical Advisory # 10, www.biomininc.com)

·        Followed by Oilsorb organoclay and activated carbon adsorption

·        Then re-injection of the clean water into the aquifer until the bulk of the contaminants are removed.

·        Then use in-situ methods to eliminate the smaller amounts of contaminants.

 

The numerous remediation technologies available for groundwater and soil remediation cover source control, free-phase remediation (Oilsorb/activated carbon), dissolved phase remediation, and natural (passive remediation) attenuation.

 

The typical remediation phases are:

·        Protect receptors

·        Control sources

·        Remediate residual and dissolved contamination

·        Monitored natural attenuation.

The goal is to achieve monitored natural attenuation in a timely, cost effective manner.

 

Assessment

 

The first general step of addressing site contamination is a detailed study assessment to determine:

 

1.     Chemicals of concern.

2.     Location and status of contaminant sources.

3.     Nature and extent of contaminated soil and groundwater.

4.     Rate and direction of contaminant migration.

5.     Status of at-risk receptors and likely exposure to pathways.

6.     Applicable and relevant regulatory requirements.

7.     Available facilities, utilities, and “room to work”.

 

Site assessment planning needs to focus on defining the chemical, physical and “social” issues while protecting the receptors, (drinking water wells, for example).

No single technology can fulfill all the expectations, which is why sequencing is often advisable. If you are not sure about the new technologies, the old, tried and true method, “Pump and Treat” with Oilsorb organoclay and activated carbon, followed by in situ technologies, is often the most efficient and most cost effective methodology. 

(see Technical Advisory #5, www.biomininc.com).

 

*Refer to:  “Technology Sequencing to Reduce Groundwater Remediation Costs” by Richard Sloan www.chickadeeusa.com.